https://svtter.cn/en/tags/coding-performance/Recent content in Coding Performance on Svtter's BlogHugo -- gohugo.ioenSat, 03 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000https://svtter.cn/en/p/coding-performance-and-model-cost-effectiveness-analysis/Sat, 03 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000https://svtter.cn/en/p/coding-performance-and-model-cost-effectiveness-analysis/<img src="https://svtter.cn/p/%E7%BC%96%E7%A0%81%E6%80%A7%E8%83%BD%E4%B8%8E%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B%E6%80%A7%E4%BB%B7%E6%AF%94%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90/pics/bg-new-v2.jpg" alt="Featured image of post Coding Performance and Model Cost-Effectiveness Analysis" /><p>This is my analysis report on the coding performance and cost-effectiveness of several models, used to compare the performance and cost efficiency of different models in coding tasks, in order to select the most suitable model.</p> <iframe src="model-comparison.pdf" style="width:100%; height:85vh; border:0;"></iframe> <p>For Chinese language tasks, using GLM 4.7 is clearly more cost-effective. The price of 2000 RMB basically covers a year of usage. The downside is that during peak hours, even the enterprise MAX version can be very slow.</p> <p>From my practical experience, the capabilities of minimax m2.1 far exceed those of GLM 4.7.</p>